Evidence Act · 2014 Revised Edition · Chapter VII
102. On whom burden of proof lies
Official textFrom Attorney General's Chambers, unchanged
The burden of proof in a suit or proceedings lies on that person who would fail if no evidence at all were given on either side.
evidence
“evidence” includes — (a) all statements which the court permits or requires to be made before it by witnesses in relation to matters of fact under inquiry: such statements are called oral evidence; (b) all documents produced for the inspection of the court: such documents are called documentary evidence.
Evidence
Illustrations
A sues B for land of which B is in possession, and which, as A asserts, was left to A by the will of C, B’s father.
If no evidence were given on either side, B would be entitled to his possession.
Therefore, the burden of proof is on A.
A sues B for money due on a bond.
The execution of the bond is admitted, but B says that it was obtained by fraud, which A denies.
If no evidence were given on either side, A would succeed as the bond is not disputed and the fraud is not proved.
Therefore, the burden of proof is on B.
Terms defined in s 3
evidence
Defined · s 3“evidence” includes — (a) all statements which the court permits or requires to be made before it by witnesses in relation to matters of fact under inquiry: such statements are called oral evidence; (b) all documents produced for the inspection of the court: such documents are called documentary evidence.