Skip to content
In force1984 Revised Edition
Contents

Part 5

108. Provisions where accused unfit to stand trial

(1)

For the purposes of this section, “unfit to stand his trial” means, in relation to the accused on trial by court-martial, that the accused —

(a)

is of unsound mind and consequently incapable of making his defence; or

(b)

though not insane, cannot be made to understand the proceedings.

(2)

Where, on the trial of a person by court-martial, it appears to the court-martial that the accused is unfit to stand trial, the court-martial shall so find; and if the finding is confirmed in accordance with the following

Royal Brunei Armed Forces provisions of this section, the accused shall be kept in custody in such manner as may be provided by or under regulations made by His Majesty the

Sultan and Yang Di-Pertuan* until the directions of His Majesty the Sultan and Yang Di-Pertuan are known or until any earlier time at which the accused is fit to stand trial.

(3)

Where, on the trial of a person by court-martial, it appears to the court-martial that the evidence is such as, apart from any question of insanity, to support a finding that the accused was guilty of any offence, but that at the time of the acts or omissions constituting that offence the accused was insane and consequently incapable at that time of knowing the nature of such acts or omissions or that such acts or omissions were either wrong or contrary to law, the court-martial shall find that the accused was not guilty of that offence by reason of insanity, and thereupon the accused shall be kept in custody in such manner as may be provided by or under regulations made by

His Majesty the Sultan and Yang Di-Pertuan* until the directions of His

Majesty the Sultan and Yang Di-Pertuan are known.

(4)

In the case of any such finding pursuant to subsections (2) or (3),

His Majesty the Sultan and Yang Di-Pertuan may give orders for the safe custody of the accused during the pleasure of His Majesty the Sultan and

Yang Di-Pertuan in such place and in such manner as His Majesty the Sultan and Yang Di-Pertuan thinks fit.

(5)

A finding under subsection (2) shall not have effect unless and until the finding has been confirmed by an officer who would have had power to confirm a finding of guilty come to by the court-martial in question and has been confirmed.

(6)

Where on the trial of a person by court-martial, the question arises (at the instance of the defence or otherwise) whether the accused is unfit to stand his trial, the following provisions shall have effect —

(a)

the court-martial, if having regard to the nature of the supposed grounds for the question arising, the court-martial is of opinion that it is expedient to do so and in the interests of the accused, may postpone consideration of the question until any time up to the opening of the case for the defence, and if before the question fails to be determined, the court-martial finds the accused not guilty of the charge or each of the charges on which he is being tried, the question shall not be determined;

* Transferred from His Majesty in Council to His Majesty the Sultan and Yang Di-Pertuan — [S 16/1986]

Royal Brunei Armed Forces 86

(b)

subject to paragraph (a), the question shall be determined as soon as it arises;

(c)

where the accused is found unfit to stand his trial, the trial shall not proceed or further proceed, but if the question is determined at a time later than on arraignment, the confirming office, or reviewing authority may substitute a finding of not guilty (other than a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity), if of opinion that the court-martial should before that time have come to such a finding.

(7)

The provisions of this Act as to confirmation and review (and in particular the provisions of this Act which confer power to substitute for any finding any other finding which could have come to by the court-martial in question) apply in relation to such findings as are provided for by subsection

(3)

as those provisions apply in relation to findings of guilty.

(8)

Where the confirming officer or reviewing authority substitute for a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity a finding of guilty of an offence, the confirming officer or reviewing authority shall have the like powers of sentencing the accused and other powers as the court-martial would have had on the like findings of guilty, and any sentence imposed shall be promulgated and have effect as would a sentence duly substituted by the confirming officer or reviewing authority for a sentence of the court-martial:

Provided that the confirming officer or reviewing authority shall not have power by virtue of this subsection to impose a sentence of death apart from this proviso a sentence of death would be required by law, the sentence shall

(whatever the circumstances) be one of imprisonment for life.

Saving for functions of Judge Advocate General

Report

Part

Forfeitures and Deductions and Enforcement of Maintenance Liabilities

Part 7

Part 8

Part 9

Schedules