Workplace Safety and Health Act · s 57

Suggest a correction

Tell us what is wrong in this text. We check every suggestion against the official version before we change anything.

What is wrong?Wrong or mistyped wordsWrong structure or numberingWrong title or detailsText that appears twice

What should change, and whyUp to 2,000 characters.The text as it should read (optional)

57.
Power to apportion cost of alterations
(1) Where in any premises, the whole or any part of which has been let as a workplace, any structural or other alterations are required in order to comply with this Act or to conform to any standard or requirement imposed by or under this Act, and the owner or occupier of the workplace, as the case may be, alleges that the whole or part of the cost of the alterations ought to be borne by the other party, the owner or occupier, as the case may be, may apply to the High Court for the cost of the alterations to be apportioned between them.
(2) The High Court may, after hearing the parties and any witness whom they may wish to call, make such an order concerning the apportionment of the cost as it considers just and equitable in the

Workplace Safety and Health circumstances of the case, regard being had to the terms of any contract between the parties, or in the alternative, the Court may, at the request of the owner or occupier of the workplace, determine the lease.

Edit the text above. Up to 20,000 characters.Where you checked it (optional)A link to the official version, if you have one.

The text as we hold it

Open the official text

s 57Power to apportion cost of alterations

(1)

Where in any premises, the whole or any part of which has been let as a workplace, any structural or other alterations are required in order to comply with this Act or to conform to any standard or requirement imposed by or under this Act, and the owner or occupier of the workplace, as the case may be, alleges that the whole or part of the cost of the alterations ought to be borne by the other party, the owner or occupier, as the case may be, may apply to the High Court for the cost of the alterations to be apportioned between them.

(2)

The High Court may, after hearing the parties and any witness whom they may wish to call, make such an order concerning the apportionment of the cost as it considers just and equitable in the